In tolling when the defendant is absent from New York when the cause of action accrues, which statement about tolling is correct?

Prepare for the Bar Exam with innovative mnemonics quizzes. Study with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, including detailed hints and explanations. Master your knowledge and ace your Bar Exam!

Multiple Choice

In tolling when the defendant is absent from New York when the cause of action accrues, which statement about tolling is correct?

Explanation:
When a defendant is outside New York when the cause of action accrues, the clock for the statute of limitations is paused because you can’t complete in-state service while they’re away. The tolling continues until the defendant returns to New York, at which point service can be effected and the limitations period resumes. This approach prevents penalizing a plaintiff for the defendant’s absence and ensures the defendant has a realistic opportunity to defend. So the tolling ends when the defendant comes to New York.

When a defendant is outside New York when the cause of action accrues, the clock for the statute of limitations is paused because you can’t complete in-state service while they’re away. The tolling continues until the defendant returns to New York, at which point service can be effected and the limitations period resumes. This approach prevents penalizing a plaintiff for the defendant’s absence and ensures the defendant has a realistic opportunity to defend. So the tolling ends when the defendant comes to New York.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy