Which of the following is a valid method of serving process on a person?

Which of the following is a valid method of serving process on a person?

• A. Personal delivery
• B. Agent specifically designated by ∆ to receive process
• C. Expedient service (with court order)
• D. Leave and Mail

Answer: (C)

When serving process, the method must be authorized by the rules, and courts can step in to speed things up when time is critical. Expedited service with a court order provides explicit authority for a faster, court-supervised method to notify the defendant, ensuring that due process is still respected. The court’s involvement gives legitimacy to the rapid approach and helps prevent challenges to service later. The other options rely on standard procedures or specific prerequisites (like personal hand-delivery, an agent with proper authority, or leave-and-mail) that may not be available or sufficient in all situations without separate approvals. So, the court-ordered expedited service is the valid mechanism because it combines speed with judicial authorization to uphold notice.

When serving process, the method must be authorized by the rules, and courts can step in to speed things up when time is critical. Expedited service with a court order provides explicit authority for a faster, court-supervised method to notify the defendant, ensuring that due process is still respected. The court’s involvement gives legitimacy to the rapid approach and helps prevent challenges to service later. The other options rely on standard procedures or specific prerequisites (like personal hand-delivery, an agent with proper authority, or leave-and-mail) that may not be available or sufficient in all situations without separate approvals. So, the court-ordered expedited service is the valid mechanism because it combines speed with judicial authorization to uphold notice.